Monument Lists: Second Term Test.
By now you should be used to coordinating H&F, assigned readings,
handouts, and lecture and section notes and image captions. Information
in the book becomes much clearer as it goes along, as does the slide archive
information scanned in with the images. So, this looks different than some
of what you have been supplied previously. I am writing commentary to the
slide lists only on certain segments, and often in outline form of what
to "know" from the image sets put up to help you grasp the monuments; you
are responsible for full info. on date, scale, etc. For selected
monuments, I repeat current knowledge not always clearly included in your
book.
*******
For H&F references, I give a list running through the chapters.
Bracketed [] means something I will not (as your lecture notes
will remind you) ask you to write a primary ID
upon, but which I expect you to be able to use in broader discussions.
Some pieces discussed before the midterm test repeat in early weeks of
the 2nd half; I haven't targeted them here.
Chapter 4:
Acropolis: 4.15, .16, .18-.20; Parthenon, .30-.32, and also the Dionysos
from the East pediment;
and know the pediment subjects; Erechtheion, know the caryatids.
4.23/29, .36, .38, .39-40, .41, .43, [44], .45, .47. .74
Chapter 5:
5.1-2, .3, .6, .7, .8, .9, .10-.20, [.21], .24-.26, .27-31, [.34: see
House of the Faun and
Boscoreale], .36-37, [38], .47, .50-56, .59-65, [72, 74], 75-77
Chapter 7:
7.1-3, .5, .7, [8], .10, .12 [Old St. Peter's & the Lateran: understand
that their dates, 313 and ca.
326,= C's great civil war victories], [11, 13-16], .17, .18, .19-21,
.22-40, .42-46, .50, [52],
54-76, [67-68], 69-74
Chapter 8:
8.1-19, [21, 23], 26-29
Chapter 9:
9.1-17, .20-22, .24-29, .31-, .38, .40-41, 46-49, 52-58.60-64, .66-69,
.70, .72-81, 83-84,
87-90. [12/3/98: obviously, there will be culls in final classes for
the focal pieces.]
********
Which images to be able to identify: think of this rather as monuments
to identify. You know well that I will only show the most obvious views,
esp. from H&F, to focus an ID. The rest of the image sets are like
the discussion on your books and in class: a (visual) discourse to explain
and clarify the monument in question. H&F often show detail or a side
only of a larger image or thing; I expect you to be able to recognize the
whole piece and understand its display (as eg, 5.7 the little detail from
the Vergina Hunt). If I and the TAs spent time explaining something to
you, then know it.
On image sets from theme sections: you know what your group focussed
on in the global image sets shared between the sections, and your own TA,
who will grade your exam, knows what to expect from you in turn.